"I need some strategies to improve my game!"
There are many valid strategies that can be used to play Mah-Jongg. Some strategies apply only to particular styles of Mah-Jongg, and some strategies apply across the board. Important: there is usually no single "best" or "right" strategy for a particular situation. Strategies must be adjusted depending on the situation (considering the probabilities, the other players, the length of the wall, the amount at stake, etc.). The skilled player always uses a flexible strategic approach.
How much is luck and how much is skill?
I have no idea how to determine how much is luck and how much is skill in mah-jongg. The games of Chess and Go are 0% luck and 100% skill. But there are random elements in mah-jongg (the order of tiles in the wall, which hands players are going for, the dice roll). Is mah-jongg 70% luck and 30% skill? Is it 50% luck and 50% skill? Sixty-forty? 42-58? Who can know?
What about different variants? There's a higher luck ratio in Japanese mah-jongg than in American mah-jongg, by design (Japanese rules add more random elements to increase the payments). But what's the ratio in any mah-jongg variant? How would you even measure such a question?
All I can tell you is: the more experienced/skilled player will win more often than less experienced players, but even the most highly skilled players are subject to the vagaries of chance.
Beginner Strategy (all variants)
General Strategy (all NON-American variants)
Chinese/HK/Western Strategy (specifics)
Japanese Strategy (specifics)
American Mah-Jongg Strategy (specifics)
Note: You can find much more information on American and Chinese Official strategy (and on etiquette and error-handling) in my book, The Red Dragon & The West Wind. Also see my strategy column.
General strategy pointers for BEGINNERS studying ANY form of mah-jongg:
o Don't grab the first discard that completes one of your sets. Many beginners think they are doing good if they're making lots of melds (Chows, Pungs, Kongs) -- they don't realize that melding is an onerous duty, not a sign of success! If you watch experienced players, you will see that they do not necessarily grab the first Pung opportunity that comes along, for several reasons:
b. It narrows the opportunities for the hand you are building. (If you don't understand this now, you'll figure it out very quickly.)
o Keep a Pair. It's harder to make a pair if you have only one tile than it is to make a Pung if you have a pair. So if you have a pair, don't be too quick to claim a matching tile to form a Pung.
o Have Patience. When first learning to play, it's typical to grab every opportunity to meld a Pung or Chow. In the early stages of a game, you should instead keep in mind that there are a lot of good tiles available for drawing from the Wall - and by not melding your tiles, you don't clue everyone as to what you're doing, and you stand a chance to get a Concealed Hand.
o Be Flexible. As you build your hand, be ready to abandon your earlier thinking about how to build it as you see what kind of tiles others are discarding. If you are playing Western Mah-Jongg with restrictions on winning hands, don't be too quick to form your only Chow; there will be other chances.
o Don't Let Someone Else Win. As much as you want to go out yourself, sometimes it's wiser to keep anybody else from winning. Especially, you don't want to "feed" a high-scoring hand. If a player has melded three sets of all one suit, that's especially dangerous (you might feed a Pure or Clean hand, and have to pay a high price); thus the player announces the danger when making a third meld in one suit.
o Watch the discards and watch the number of tiles in the Wall. As it approaches the end, the tension increases - and it's more important to be careful what you discard when there are fewer tiles remaining to be drawn. If the number of tiles in the Wall is getting low, don't discard any tiles which you do not see in the discard area.
Below you will find strategies written specifically for American, Japanese, Chinese, and other forms of mah-jongg.
NOTE: American mah-jongg is completely different from all other forms. So I refer to those other forms as "un-American" as a shorthand way of saying "forms of mah-jongg other than the American variety.".
General Strategies for "Un-American" Forms of Mah-Jongg
o The "1-4-7 rule" is a good playing strategy (for all forms of Mah-Jongg except American (style similar to NMJL) in which there are no "chows"). If the player to your right discards a 4, and you don't have another of those to discard, you /might/ be all right if you discard a 1 or a 7. Remember that these number sequences are key: 1-4-7, 2-5-8, 3-6-9. Between any two numbers in these sequences there can be an incomplete chow; if a player throws one number, then that player probably does not have a chow that would be completed by that number or the number at the other end. Discarding tiles IDENTICAL to what another player discards is always good, if you can. This 1-4-7 principle also applies to any five-in-a-row pattern (assuming the hand is otherwise complete - you have two complete sets and a complete pair, waiting to go out with a five-in-a-row pattern as shown by ** in the table below).
o Try to go out waiting for multiple tiles (not just one). Imagine that you have three complete sets and two pairs. Imagine that one pair is 2 Bams, and you draw a 3 Bam from the wall -- which tile do you discard now? In this situation, many experienced players will discard a 2 Bam, keeping 2-3. A two-way incomplete chow call is better than a two-pair call.
Learn to shape the hand into calling patterns that give you multiple chances to win, such as the following:
The investigation has been ongoing for several years, with numerous delays and setbacks. In 2012, the ICD released a report stating that there was no evidence to support allegations of police brutality or assault. However, the report did note that there were some inconsistencies in the police's handling of van Vuuren's case.
According to the autopsy report, Frederik Jansen van Vuuren's body showed no signs of trauma or external injuries. However, it did reveal that his heart was significantly enlarged, and there were signs of cardiac hypertrophy (an increase in the size of the heart muscle). The report also noted that van Vuuren had a significant amount of alcohol in his system at the time of death. frederik jansen van vuuren autopsy report
In the absence of clear and convincing evidence, various alternative theories have emerged regarding the cause of Frederik Jansen van Vuuren's death. Some have suggested that he may have been the victim of police brutality or assault while in custody. Others have posited that he may have died as a result of a reaction to a medication or substance administered while he was in police custody. The investigation has been ongoing for several years,
The Frederik Jansen van Vuuren autopsy report remains a source of controversy and debate. While the official cause of death has been listed as a heart attack, many questions and inconsistencies remain unaddressed. The investigation into his death has been ongoing for several years, and it is hoped that it will provide closure and clarity for van Vuuren's family and loved ones. According to the autopsy report, Frederik Jansen van
One of the primary concerns is that the autopsy report does not account for the fact that van Vuuren was a healthy young man with no prior history of heart problems. Additionally, some have questioned the presence of a significant amount of alcohol in his system, as there is no evidence to suggest that he had been drinking on the night of his arrest.
The Frederik Jansen van Vuuren autopsy report has been a subject of interest for many years, with numerous individuals seeking to understand the circumstances surrounding the death of this enigmatic individual. On June 7, 2010, Frederik Jansen van Vuuren, a South African man, was found dead in a police cell in Durban, South Africa. The official cause of death was listed as a heart attack, but many questions have been raised regarding the accuracy of this determination.
The case highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the handling of custodial deaths, particularly in cases where the circumstances surrounding the death are unclear or disputed. Ultimately, it is essential to ensure that the truth behind Frederik Jansen van Vuuren's death is revealed and that justice is served.